“In Remembrance of Me”
We often take these words for granted when we hear them spoken at each communion. But it is always good to think about what exactly we are to be remembering. When Jesus broke bread with his disciples at the last supper, he commanded them to do likewise in remembrance of him. 1
Many times we simply assume that this means in remembrance of Jesus’ death on the cross. After all, that commandment was given “on the night on which he was betrayed,” the evening before he went to the cross. But at the same time, we should not turn the Lord’s Table into the commemoration of an event, for it is given to us to be the remembrance of a person.
Communion is given to us to remember Christ and all that he is. Of course this includes remembering his primary earthly mission to die on the cross for the atonement of sin. But in remembering the event we must not lose sight of the whole person. There is a historical and eschatological aspect to what we do at the Table. We must remember Jesus Christ—who he was, what he became, what he did, who he is and what he is doing now, and what he has yet promised to do. Every time we eat and drink, we declare (in the present) Christ’s death (in the past) until he comes (in the future). What Paul says here has a scope as broad as all of history, which requires the remembering of Christ’s whole person and work.
Therefore, we should not have an unhealthy preoccupation with Jesus’ suffering when we approach the table. Yes, we remember it as an essential part of who he is and what he did on our behalf. But that is not all he is. When we remember Jesus, let us remember him as very God the Son, sent from the Father, who took on our human nature, who was sinless, who died for sin and rose again, who ascended to the right hand of the Father, who makes intercession, who meets with us in worship, who will come again to judge the living and the dead, and who will claim his bride, the Church, to close the final chapter of history. If we neglect any of these things in communion and instead turn the Table into the memorial of a single event, then I think we do not properly remember Jesus Christ, the person.
Historically, the Eucharistic prayer has been specifically worded to remember Christ in this way. In a full prayer, rather than reducing the remembrance only to Jesus’ betrayal and death, we remember Jesus the person and all he has done, is doing and will yet do. This is not to say that we must have a written prayer that follows a strict wording preapproved by some hierarchical oversight (not to say there is anything inherently wrong with precomposed prayers either). Justin Martyr describes the early Eucharistic prayers as extemporaneous. But whether extemporaneous or precomposed, the prayer should be framed to deliberately remember and offer thanksgiving for and to Jesus Christ the person.
- There are some other issues that I would love to look at in the future but won’t deal with here, such as whether anamnesis should be translated “in remembrance of me” or “as my memorial,” and also whether poiete is imperative or indicative, which is itself an interesting discussion. ↩














